Skip to main content
· 4/19/1886

Cashman v. Amador & Sacramento Canal Co.

Citations

  • 118 U.S. 58
  • 6 S. Ct. 926
  • 30 L. Ed. 72
  • 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1901

Syllabus

<p>On the facts stated in the opinion of the court, it is held that the assignment of the cause of action to the plaintiff in error was collusively made for the purpose of creating a case cognizable by the Circuit Court of the United States, and that the controversy is really and substantially between one of the counties of California and citizens of California, and is not properly within the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court.</p>

Judges: Waite

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.