Skip to main content
· 1/17/1898

Wetmore v. Rymer

Citations

  • 169 U.S. 115
  • 18 S. Ct. 293
  • 42 L. Ed. 682
  • 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1476

Syllabus

<p>In an action of ejectment the question whether the land in dispute is of sufficient value to give a Circuit Court jurisdiction is purely one of fact, and the statutes regulating jurisdiction leave the mode of trying such issues to the discretion of the trial judge.</p> <p>Whether he elects to submit such issue to a jury, or to himself hear and determine it without the intervention of a jury, in either event the parties are not concluded by the judgment of the Circuit Court.</p> <p>In this case the question was passed upon by the court below on affidavits, and the judgment dismissing the action for want of jurisdiction is reviewable here. ■</p> <p>A suit cannot properly be dismissed by a Circuit Court as not involving a controversy of an amount sufficient to come within its jurisdiction, unless the facts, when made to appear on the record, create a legal certainty of that conclusion.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the district court is free to determine facts relevant to its jurisdiction
  • district court is free to determine facts relevant to its jurisdiction
  • the district court is free to determine facts relevant to its jurisdiction
  • describing “trial[s] had with a jury” over subject-matter ju- risdiction
  • describing “trial[s] had with a jury” over subject-matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shiras, After Making the Above Statement

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.