Derrick McLean v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allegations that a tape recording might be exculpatory or of impeachment value to the defendant’s case was speculative and could not provide a basis for postconviction relief
• “McLean has not established prejudice because ‘[t]he mitigating evidence adduced at the evidentiary hearing combined with the mitigating evidence presented at the penalty phase would not outweigh the evidence in aggravation[.]’ Tanzi v. State, 94 So. 3d 482, 491 (Fla. 2012

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).