Ninth Circuit· 8/19/1997
Belgarde v. Montana
Citations
- 123 F.3d 1210
- 97 Daily Journal DAR 10740
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6576
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 21866
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[h]abeas claims that are not raised in the petition before the district court are not cognizable on appeal” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- noting that we construe pro se petitioners’ use of habeas forms “with deference”
- \Habeas claims that are not raised in the petition before the district court are not cognizable on appeal.\
- Double Jeopardy clause does not apply to multiple elements of punishment for the same offense
- “Belgarde did not raise these claims in his original habeas petition to the district court. . . . Therefore, . . . we do not consider them in this appeal.”
- ‘We construe a pro se litigant’s habeas petition with deference.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Choy, Ferguson, Wiggins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bean v. CalderonNinth Circuit· 1998-12-15· cited 229×
- John J. Zichko v. State of Idaho Larry Wright, Warden Alan LanceNinth Circuit· 2001-06-05· cited 167×
- John WINDHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William MERKLE, Respondent-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1998-12-17· cited 165×
- Jeffrey J. Biggs v. Cal A. Terhune, Director of Wbs/jfm CDC California Board of Prison Terms Board of Prison TermsNinth Circuit· 2003-06-30· cited 142×
- Ramon L. Smith v. State of IdahoNinth Circuit· 2004-11-30· cited 103×
- Ronald Ross v. WilliamsNinth Circuit· 2020-02-24· cited 98×
- Kevin Cooper v. Arthur Calderon, Warden of California State Prison at San QuentinNinth Circuit· 2001-07-09· cited 41×
- In re D.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2003-12-18· cited 39×
- Ernest SELAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WARM SPRINGS TRIBAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Defendant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1998-01-21· cited 31×
- United States v. ReynardS.D. California· 2002-08-26· cited 30×
- Tong Xiong v. Tom FelkerNinth Circuit· 2012-06-05· cited 26×
- Rowley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2006-05-02· cited 26×
- Darris Young v. David L. Runnels, WardenNinth Circuit· 2006-01-23· cited 23×
- Vore v. United States Department of JusticeD. Arizona· 2003-09-08· cited 22×
- Eisermann v. PenarosaD. Hawaii· 1999-01-28· cited 18×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1997-08-19· cited 17×
- Konolus Smith v. Garry SwarthoutNinth Circuit· 2014-02-10· cited 15×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1998-12-15· cited 2×
- Sterling v. RoeNinth Circuit· 2003-02-26· cited 1×
- Walters v. People of State of Cal.C.D. California· 1998-03-17
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentNinth Circuit· 1990-05-11· cited 5,771×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 2,182×
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,994×
- Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court· 1957-02-25· cited 760×
- Jerry F. Stanley v. California Supreme CourtNinth Circuit· 1994-05-18· cited 371×
- Dominick Cacoperdo v. Peter Demosthenes the Attorney General of the State of NevadaNinth Circuit· 1994-10-04· cited 316×
- United States v. Lesester D. McDougherty AKA Lester JohnsonNinth Circuit· 1990-11-28· cited 159×
- Carriger v. LewisNinth Circuit· 1992-07-28· cited 151×
- United States v. Warren James BlandNinth Circuit· 1992-03-20· cited 120×
- Wmx Technologies, Inc. v. MillerNinth Circuit· 1997-01-02· cited 89×
- Miles v. StainerNinth Circuit· 1997-03-11· cited 71×
- United States v. Luis Rodolfo Zavala-Serra, United States of America v. Maria Novoa CruzNinth Circuit· 1988-08-11· cited 58×
- Raymond F. Riley v. George DeedsNinth Circuit· 1995-06-06· cited 55×
- Michael E. HARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert WRIGHT, Superintendent, Clallam Bay Correction Center, Respondent-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1996-08-19· cited 51×
- Rise v. State of OregonNinth Circuit· 1995-07-18· cited 38×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo SCARANO, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1996-02-20· cited 30×
- Bynum v. State Farm InsuranceSupreme Court· 1996-04-22· cited 29×
- Tho Van Huynh v. Stacy L. King, WardenEleventh Circuit· 1996-11-27· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.