· 5/18/1994
Jerry F. Stanley v. California Supreme Court
Citations
- 21 F.3d 359
- 1994 WL 120165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the proper respondent “typically is the warden of the facility in which the petitioner is incarcerated” (citation omitted)
- stating that the proper respondent “typically is the warden of the facility in which the petitioner is incarcerated” (citation omitted)
- stating that the proper respondent “typically is the warden of the facility in which the petitioner is incarcerated” (citation omitted)
- stating that the proper respondent “typically is the warden of the facility in which the petitioner is incarcerated” (citation omitted)
- stating that the proper respondent “typically is the warden of the facility in which the petitioner is incarcerated” (citation omitted)
- stating that the proper respondent “typically is the warden of the facility in which the petitioner is incarcerated” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tang, O'Scannlain, Nelson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.