Skip to main content
· 5/18/1994

Jerry F. Stanley v. California Supreme Court

Citations

  • 21 F.3d 359
  • 1994 WL 120165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the proper respondent “typically is the warden of the facility in which the petitioner is incarcerated” (citation omitted)
  • stating that the proper respondent “typically is the warden of the facility in which the petitioner is incarcerated” (citation omitted)
  • stating that the proper respondent “typically is the warden of the facility in which the petitioner is incarcerated” (citation omitted)
  • stating that the proper respondent “typically is the warden of the facility in which the petitioner is incarcerated” (citation omitted)
  • stating that the proper respondent “typically is the warden of the facility in which the petitioner is incarcerated” (citation omitted)
  • stating that the proper respondent “typically is the warden of the facility in which the petitioner is incarcerated” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tang, O'Scannlain, Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.