Ramon L. Smith v. State of Idaho

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the custodian is the state’s agent” and must be “named as a respondent”
• noting that “the custodian is the state's agent” and 23 must be “named as a respondent”
• “[I]t is well-recognized that personal jurisdiction—unlike subject-matter jurisdiction—may be waived.” (citing Ins. Corp. of Ir. v. Compagnie des Bauxites de Guinee, 456 U.S. 694, 703 (1982))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).