United States v. Warren James Bland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court's comments to the jury venire was not a harmless error and remanding for a new trial
• holding that the court’s comments to the jury venire was not a harmless error and remanding for a new trial
• holding that the Miranda warning -15- given to the defendant was “inadequate” because law enforcement “failed to mention” he “was entitled to have an attorney during questioning”
• finding Miranda warning inadequate when it failed to advise the petitioner of the right to counsel during questioning
• finding Miranda warning inadequate when it failed to advise the petitioner of the right to counsel during questioning
• “We do not reach [defendant’s] arguments regarding the legality of his sentence because we conclude that his conviction should be reversed and he should be granted a new trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).