Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 4/10/2000
Becker v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Citations
- 529 S.E.2d 758
- 339 S.C. 629
- 2000 S.C. App. LEXIS 57
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \An abuse of discretion occurs if the [circuit]court's findings are wholly unsupported by the evidence or the conclusions reached are controlled by an error of law.\
- \The decision to grant a new trial absolute based on the excessiveness of a verdict rests in the sound discretion of the [circuit] court and ordinarily will not be disturbed on appeal.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Connor, Goolsby, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Proctor v. Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-03-20· cited 51×
- Burke v. AnMed HealthCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-04-27· cited 30×
- Youmans v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-09-24· cited 11×
- Kelley v. WrenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-01-13· cited 2×
- Encore Technology Group, LLC v. Keone Trask & Clear TouchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-11-03
- Click Properties, LLC v. Thomas SC Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2025-03-12
- Meswaet Abel v. Lack's Beach ServiceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2025-07-16
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. SpeedSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-06-23· cited 128×
- Vinson v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-10-14· cited 113×
- Creech v. South Carolina Wildlife & Marine Resources DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-08-25· cited 98×
- Hawkins v. Greenwood Development Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-10-27· cited 86×
- O'Neal v. BowlesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-05-17· cited 80×
- Rush v. BlanchardSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-02-01· cited 60×
- Lucht Ex Rel. Estate of Lucht v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-01-20· cited 44×
- Bailey v. PeacockSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-02-27· cited 31×
- Hutson v. Cummins Carolinas, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-21· cited 30×
- Allstate Insurance v. DurhamSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-05-17· cited 26×
- Smalls v. South Carolina Department of EducationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-02-22· cited 23×
- Easler v. HEJAZ TEMPLE OF GREENVILLE, SCSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-04-25· cited 21×
- Krepps Ex Rel. Krepps v. AusenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-04· cited 18×
- Benton & Rhodes, Inc. v. BodenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-01-11· cited 16×
- Scoggins v. McClellionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-03-04· cited 10×
- Marsh v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1989-05-30· cited 9×
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1951-12-04· cited 8×
- Hall v. PALMETTO ENTR. II, INC., OF CLINTONCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-06-01· cited 6×
- Cabler v. L. v. Hart, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1968-11-20· cited 6×
- Daniel v. Sharpe Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-05-10· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.