Skip to main content
· 2/27/1995

Bailey v. Peacock

Citations

  • 455 S.E.2d 690
  • 318 S.C. 13
  • 1995 S.C. LEXIS 34

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining impropriety of granting additur or remittitur on the basis of the “thirteenth juror” doctrine
  • stating compelling reasons must be given to justify invading the jury’s province
  • “If an award is merely inadequate or unduly liberal, the trial judge alone has the discretion to grant a new trial nisi additur.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chandler, Curtis, Finney, Shaw, Toal, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.