Dunlap v. Dunlap

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering child support order settled and unreviewable because appellant failed to seek timely review
• “Although our doctrine of law of the case generally refers to issues that have previously been reviewed at the appellate level, the doctrine is equally applicable to issues that have been fully litigated in the superior court and as to which no timely appeal has been made.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. Johnson
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2010-09-24· cited 41×
• Noland v. Virginia Insurance Reciprocal
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2009-09-24· cited 38×
• Beal v. Beal
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2009-06-12· cited 32×
• Wolff v. Cunningham
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2008-07-11· cited 11×
• Barber v. State, Department of Corrections
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2017-03-17· cited 6×
• Robert A. v. Tatiana D.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2020-10-23· cited 6×
• Barber v. State, Dept. of Corrections
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2017-03-17

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. Carlson
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2003-03-14· cited 77×
• Patrick v. Sedwick
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1966-04-21· cited 69×
• Alaska Diversified Contractors, Inc. v. Lower Kuskokwim School District
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1989-07-28· cited 44×
• Beal v. Beal
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2004-02-27· cited 28×
• Hermosillo v. Hermosillo
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1990-09-07· cited 24×
• Stenehjem v. Kyn Jin Cho
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1981-07-24· cited 20×
• Gaston v. Gaston
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1998-02-20· cited 16×
• George v. Custer
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1993-11-12· cited 10×