Dieringer v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing prior decision remanding to superior court “for reconsideration of attorney’s fees and fees of the personal representative in light of the conclusions expressed herein”
• stating AS 13.16.435 allows personal representative “who has prosecuted or defended a probate action in good faith is entitled to recover all necessary expenses” (emphasis added) (quoting Enders, 66 P.3d at 14)
• applying law of the case doctrine to factual issues involving (continued...
• “[T]he attorney is the real party in interest . . . to the extent the fee is later attacked.”
• “[T]he attorney is the real party in interest . . . to the extent the fee is later attacked.” (quoting In re Estate of Borrego, 490 N.W.2d 833, 837 (Iowa 1992))
• discussing law of the case doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).