Seventh Circuit· 1/20/2010
Bayo v. Napolitano
Citations
- 593 F.3d 495
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 1166
- 2010 WL 174231
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that waiver of the right to a full immigration hearing implicates the constitutional right to due process that aliens acquire upon entry, and therefore must be done both knowingly and voluntarily
- “Once he crossed the border, Bayo, became entitled to certain constitutional rights,, including the right to due process.”
- narrowing Freeman v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir.2006)
- \[A] federal court always has jurisdiction to determine its own jurisdiction.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Bauer, Posner, Coffey, Flaum, Kanne, Rovner, Wood, Evans, Williams, Sykes, Tinder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 242×
- Harold Riera-Riera v. Loretta E. LynchNinth Circuit· 2016-11-28· cited 131×
- United States v. RoxworthySixth Circuit· 2006-08-10· cited 112×
- Johana Cece v. Eric Holder, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 2013-08-09· cited 80×
- Bradley v. Attorney General of the United StatesThird Circuit· 2010-04-22· cited 65×
- Adnan Issaq v. Eric Holder, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 2010-08-17· cited 37×
- Bingham v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2011-03-23· cited 30×
- Mariya Georgieva v. Eric Holder, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 2014-05-06· cited 30×
- Gjerjaj v. HolderSecond Circuit· 2012-08-28· cited 20×
- Gustavo Nardea v. Jefferson Sessions IIIFourth Circuit· 2017-11-29· cited 16×
- Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. Strauss (In re Strauss)N.D. Illinois· 2014-12-22· cited 12×
- Anthony Kimani v. Eric Holder, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 2012-08-22· cited 11×
- O'Riordan v. BarrFirst Circuit· 2019-05-22· cited 9×
- United States v. Nicolas Alegria-SaldanaSeventh Circuit· 2014-04-17· cited 8×
- D-M-C-PBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2015-07-01· cited 8×
- Vera v. Attorney General of the United StatesThird Circuit· 2012-03-01· cited 7×
- Sevilla v. United StatesN.D. Illinois· 2012-04-04· cited 7×
- Galluzzo v. HolderSecond Circuit· 2011-01-26· cited 6×
- M.S.P.C. v. U.S. Customs & Border ProtectionD. New Mexico· 2014-10-16· cited 6×
- Vasconcelos v. LynchSecond Circuit· 2016-11-02· cited 5×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 3,921×
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court· 2001-06-28· cited 3,847×
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 3,789×
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court· 1982-09-09· cited 2,739×
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court· 2005-06-27· cited 1,506×
- Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-01-08· cited 1,263×
- United States v. RuizSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 1,180×
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court· 1966-12-12· cited 1,005×
- Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. MezeiSupreme Court· 1953-03-16· cited 871×
- Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court· 1951-10-15· cited 849×
- Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court· 1952-03-10· cited 717×
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court· 1937-04-26· cited 712×
- Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 672×
- Aetna Insurance v. Kennedy Ex Rel. BogashSupreme Court· 1937-05-17· cited 531×
- The Japanese Immigrant CaseSupreme Court· 1903-04-06· cited 492×
- Negusie v. HolderSupreme Court· 2009-03-03· cited 322×
- City of West Covina v. PerkinsSupreme Court· 1999-01-13· cited 212×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.