Bingham v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding jurisdiction to review a VWP entrant’s final order of removal under section 242(a)(1) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1) (2006)
• rejecting VWP entrant’s argument that the no-contest clause was ambiguous as to whether it prevents applying “for forms of affirmative relief from removal”
• noting VWP entrants waive their right “to contest, other than on the basis of an application for asylum, any action for removal of the alien”
• relying on Bradley and Bayo in holding that VWP entrant could not demonstrate prejudice on basis of an allegedly unknowing or involuntary waiver
• “If he had refused to sign the waiver [in the form I-94W] authorities would not have permitted entry.”
• plaintiff was required to sign a form giving up any right to challenge 26 removal proceedings did not implicate unconstitutional conditions doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).