Skip to main content

Barrett v. State

Citations

  • 775 P.2d 1276
  • 105 Nev. 361
  • 1989 Nev. LEXIS 75

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a district court may not enhance a primary substantive offense under more than one enhancement statute
  • upholding a sentence enhancement for using a deadly weapon when the defendant sprayed a robbery victim with mace
  • no kidnapping charges when victim was sprayed with mace and tied up during associated robbery
  • \The sentencing court may enhance each primary offense pursuant to one enhancement statute.\ (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.