Skip to main content
· 2/20/1986

Odoms v. State

Citations

  • 714 P.2d 568
  • 102 Nev. 27
  • 1986 Nev. LEXIS 1094

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court may enhance a sentence for the use of a deadly weapon or under the habitual criminal statute, but not both
  • holding that sentence for each primary offense may be enhanced under NRS 207.010
  • noting that \society has the right to remove from its ranks for a longer time those who refuse to conform to a lawful mode of living\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • convictions for burglary and attempted murder arising from the same incident may each be enhanced by the habitual offender statute
  • man found sleeping in vacated hotel room without standing to challenge police entry and subsequent seizure of weapon
  • defendant lacked legitimate expectation of privacy and lacked standing to challenge search and seizure in hotel room; he had entered room in which he was sleeping through unlocked door; room had been vacated by former registered guest who had left door unlocked

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.