Demoney-Hendrickson v. Larsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a known informant's detailed account of criminality, much of which was corroborated, supplied probable cause to arrest \under the facts and circumstances\
• probable cause where a paid, reliable informant and tip corroborated by personal observations of the arresting officer
• “There is a large difference between the two things to be proved” [referring to guilt and probable cause]
• probable cause to make warrantless arrest where police independently corroborated informant’s story, even though corroborating detail was of entirely innocent activity
• “There is a large difference between the two things to be proved” [referring to guilt and probable cause]
• petitioner “goes much too far in confusing and disregarding the difference between what is required to prove guilt in a criminal case and what is required to show probable cause for arrest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).