Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 6/11/2010

Barhoumi v. Obama

Citations

  • 609 F.3d 416
  • 391 U.S. App. D.C. 207
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 12847
  • 2010 WL 2553540

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “an intelligence report’s reliability can be assessed by comparison to ‘exogenous information’ ”
  • noting that “an intelligence report’s reliability can be assessed by comparison to ‘exogenous information’ ”
  • noting that whether the facts found by the district court are sufficient to establish that an individual was “part of’ al-Qaida is a legal question that we review de novo
  • noting that \Parhat sets the guideposts for [courts'] inquiry into the reliability of ... hearsay\ in habeas proceedings like this one
  • noting that \an intelligence report's reliability can be assessed by comparison to 'exogenous information\'
  • noting that “raw” intelligence may be admissible where it is “presented in a form, or with sufficient additional information, that permits . . . [the] court to assess its reliability” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Tatel, and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Barhoumi v. Obama

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.