United States v. Martinez-Gaytan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Nazemian because accuracy of interpreted statements appeared “less reliable” than statements in other cases
• distinguishing Nazemian because accuracy of interpreted statements appeared “less reliable” than statements in other cases
• vacating denial of motion to suppress defendant’s confession interpreted into English by federal agent so that court could assess the agent’s ability as an interpreter and give defendant opportunity to attack quality of interpretations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).