Skip to main content
· 5/19/2009

Hamlily v. Obama

Citations

  • 616 F. Supp. 2d 63
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43249
  • 2009 WL 1393113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the district court erred in \requir[ing] each piece of the government's evidence to bear weight without regard to all (or indeed any) other evidence in the case\
  • finding that an individual need only function within the command structure of the Taliban to be lawfully detained
  • stating that an individual who houses, feeds or transports, AI-Qaida forces may be considered functionally part of the enemy forces.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John D. Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.