Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 6/30/2008

Parhat, Huzaifa v. Gates, Robert

Citations

  • 382 U.S. App. D.C. 233
  • 532 F.3d 834

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging certain “intelligence reports plainly are” “hearsay evidence”
  • “[R]equests to designate information as protected require specificity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Garland, Griffith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Parhat, Huzaifa v. Gates, Robert

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.