Michigan Court of Appeals· 9/19/2000
Barclay v. Crown Building & Development, Inc.
Citations
- 617 N.W.2d 373
- 241 Mich. App. 639
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the party served does not have to accept service of process—it is enough that the process server leaves the summons and complaint in the party’s control after identifying the documents
- upholding the trial court’s finding that the defendant was served, despite his sworn assertions that he was not
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, Sawyer, Griffin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Marshall Lasser, PC v. GeorgeMichigan Court of Appeals· 2002-09-24· cited 93×
- ISB Sales Co. v. Dave's CakesMichigan Court of Appeals· 2003-11-26· cited 53×
- Anspaugh v. Imlay TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals· 2007-03-14· cited 2×
- Roland Tindle Do v. Legend Health PllcMichigan Court of Appeals· 2023-04-20
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 2,853×
- Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court· 1993-05-25· cited 319×
- Alken-Ziegler, Inc. v. Waterbury Headers Corp.Michigan Supreme Court· 1999-10-12· cited 149×
- Bossuk v. SteinbergNew York Court of Appeals· 1983-02-17· cited 109×
- Losego v. Guernsey County Board of EducationSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 78×
- Flex Credit, Inc. v. WinkowitschNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-08-16· cited 31×
- Nielsen v. BralandSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1963-02-01· cited 31×
- In Re GosnellMichigan Court of Appeals· 1999-06-10· cited 27×
- Sturak v. OzomaroMichigan Court of Appeals· 2000-02-23· cited 17×
- Ooley v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court· 1955-12-01· cited 16×
- Hatmaker v. HatmakerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1949-03-01· cited 15×
- Jacobson v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-06-09· cited 14×
- Roth v. W. T. Cowan, Inc.E.D. New York· 1951-05-18· cited 14×
- Mason v. LettsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1968-11-27· cited 13×
- Schenkman v. SchenkmanNew York Supreme Court· 1954-10-28· cited 13×
- Wood v. WeenigCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1987-05-12· cited 12×
- Spector v. BermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-04-07· cited 12×
- CRB v. State, Department of Family ServicesWyoming Supreme Court· 1999-02-25· cited 11×
- People v. FeatherstoneMichigan Court of Appeals· 1979-11-06· cited 11×
- Felix v. FelixMichigan Court of Appeals· 1973-06-26· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.