Skip to main content
· 10/12/1999

Alken-Ziegler, Inc. v. Waterbury Headers Corp.

Citations

  • 600 N.W.2d 638
  • 461 Mich. 219
  • 1999 Mich. LEXIS 2234

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “manifest injustice” occurs where a default remains even after a party has established good cause and a meritorious defense
  • observing that we give “ ‘great deference’ ” in matters involving the discretion of trial courts
  • stating that “the policy of this state is generally against setting aside defaults and default judgments that have been properly entered”
  • determining alimony is within the trial court's discretion and involves consideration of certain enumerated factors
  • “[I]f a party states a meritorious defense that would be absolute if proven, a lesser showing of ‘good cause’ will be required than if the defense were weaker, in order to prevent manifest injustice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weaver, Cavanagh, Kelly, Taylor, Corrigan, Young, Markman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.