Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2/1/1963
Nielsen v. Braland
Citations
- 264 Minn. 481
- 119 N.W.2d 737
- 1963 Minn. LEXIS 616
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where “defendant was in close proximity to the processor server, was touched with summons, and the summons was laid in a place easily accessible to him”
- when process server touched the defendant with summons, which was then laid in place easily accessible to defendant, service was adequate although defendant refused to pick up the process or accept service
- “if the process server and the defendant are within speaking distance of each other, and such action is taken as to convince a reasonable person that personal service is being attempted, service cannot be avoided by physical refusing to accept the summons.”
- “If the process server and the defendant are within speaking distance of each other, and such action is taken as to convince a reasonable person that personal service is being attempted, service cannot be avoided by physically refusing to accept the summons.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Knutson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 683×
- Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-08-06· cited 117×
- Oxmans' Erwin Meat Co. v. BlacketerWisconsin Supreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 53×
- Barclay v. Crown Building & Development, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals· 2000-09-19· cited 33×
- In Re Marriage of McLeanWashington Supreme Court· 1997-06-05· cited 28×
- Banco Latino, S.A.C.A. v. Gomez LopezS.D. Florida· 1999-05-13· cited 25×
- In re the Marriage of McLeanWashington Supreme Court· 1997-06-05· cited 24×
- Hickey v. MerritCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1973-04-11· cited 23×
- Currier v. BaldridgeSeventh Circuit· 1990-10-01· cited 22×
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1975-03-13· cited 12×
- Kmart Corp. v. County of ClaySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-03-30· cited 12×
- Melendrez v. BodeAlaska Supreme Court· 1997-07-25· cited 11×
- Fagin v. FaginNevada Supreme Court· 1975-12-19· cited 8×
- Waite v. WaiteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-05-14· cited 8×
- Currier v. BaldridgeSeventh Circuit· 1990-12-04· cited 7×
- State v. CountsSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1982-12-03· cited 4×
- Cass County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Wold Properties, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1977-04-25· cited 4×
- Douglas Drews v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-07-21· cited 4×
- Rosen v. RosenSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1979-07-23· cited 3×
- State v. OlsenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-12-08· cited 3×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1959-11-20· cited 91×
- Atkins v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1960-08-05· cited 57×
- Dahlberg Co. v. Western Hearing Aid Center, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1961-01-27· cited 36×
- Hatmaker v. HatmakerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1949-03-01· cited 15×
- Roth v. W. T. Cowan, Inc.E.D. New York· 1951-05-18· cited 14×
- Schenkman v. SchenkmanNew York Supreme Court· 1954-10-28· cited 13×
- Callaghan v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1921-03-04· cited 12×
- Nerlund v. SchiavoneSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1957-06-28· cited 11×
- Crow v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1922-10-28· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.