Anspaugh v. Imlay Township

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In determining whether the court has abused its discretion, we must determine whether the trial court appropriately considered the options available.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Anspaugh v. IMLAY TOWNSHIP
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2007-12-07· cited 4×
• James Dale Schmidt v. Ashley Denise Eft
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2016-11-09

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Maiden v. Rozwood
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1999-07-30· cited 2,570×
• Maldonado v. Ford Motor Co.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2006-07-31· cited 538×
• Alken-Ziegler, Inc. v. Waterbury Headers Corp.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1999-10-12· cited 149×
• Barclay v. Crown Building & Development, Inc.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2000-09-19· cited 33×
• Banta v. Serban
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1963-06-03· cited 28×
• Smookler v. Wheatfield Township
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1975-08-19· cited 17×
• Eveline Township v. H & D Trucking Co.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1989-11-06· cited 13×
• English v. Augusta Township
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1994-03-07· cited 13×
• Szluha v. Avon Charter Township
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1983-08-31· cited 9×