District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/16/1990
Barber v. State
Citations
- 564 So. 2d 1169
- 1990 WL 98484
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding constitutionality of the 1987 version of this statute against equal protection and due process challenges
- although this case addresses constitutionality of 1987 version of section 775.084, analysis is equally applicable to challenge of 1988 amended version
- in rejecting argument that habitual offender statute is unconstitutional, court noted in dictum that statute was not expressly applicable to life felonies
- habitual felony offender statute is not irrational for failure to make any provision for enhancement of first-degree felonies punishable by life, life felonies, or capital felonies
- although this case addresses constitutionality of 1987 version of section 774.084, analysis is equally applicable to challenge of 1988 amended version
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ervin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Woods v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-26· cited 146×
- Rollinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-29· cited 39×
- Pittman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-27· cited 36×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-15· cited 34×
- Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-13· cited 33×
- Burdick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-25· cited 32×
- Perkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-31· cited 31×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-08· cited 26×
- Love v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-16· cited 25×
- London v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-16· cited 21×
- Bradford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-04· cited 21×
- Henderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-15· cited 18×
- Tillman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-09-30· cited 15×
- Caristi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-11· cited 14×
- Newton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-06-05· cited 14×
- Hodges v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-03-24· cited 13×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-28· cited 13×
- Lamont v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-28· cited 12×
- Westbrook v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-12· cited 12×
- Gholston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-26· cited 12×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court· 1978-03-06· cited 2,683×
- Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 1,798×
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court· 1962-02-19· cited 1,736×
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 1,692×
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 1,568×
- Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Sullivan v. AsheSupreme Court· 1937-11-08· cited 270×
- Moore v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1895-11-18· cited 240×
- United States v. EvansSupreme Court· 1948-05-03· cited 217×
- State v. BloomSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-11-06· cited 83×
- Sullivan v. AskewSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-06-30· cited 56×
- State v. BusseySupreme Court of Florida· 1985-02-07· cited 55×
- State v. SaiezSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-06-12· cited 51×
- Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-02-22· cited 26×
- State v. CogswellSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-03-10· cited 22×
- Owen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-12-12· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.