Skip to main content

Bradford v. State

Citations

  • 567 So. 2d 911
  • 1990 WL 126318

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the officer did not have a reasonable suspicion to support his pat-down search of the defendant based only on the defendant's wearing a loose jacket
  • holding that the officer did not have a reasonable suspicion to support his pat-down search of the defendant based only on the defendant’s wearing a loose jacket
  • discussing that although officer was not engaged in lawful performance of his duties when he initially searched defendant, defendant's intentional striking of officer during the encounter constituted battery or resisting arrest with violence
  • sufficiency of evidence on lesser-included crime cannot be considered when evidence is sufficient to convict for greater one
  • “It is clear that appellant did receive this record notice of the state’s intentions at the end of the trial (27 days prior to his sentencing), giving ample time to prepare a submission at sentencing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wentworth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.