Skip to main content

Henderson v. State

Citations

  • 569 So. 2d 925
  • 1990 WL 178650

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling a “perfunctory argument” made by the appellant did not “properly preserve[] and present[]” the issue for review in the appeal
  • declining to consider a “perfunctory argument” with “no caselaw or other authority” provided in support
  • declining to consider a “perfunctory argument” with “no caselaw or other authority” provided in support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zehmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.