Skip to main content

Woods v. State

Citations

  • 740 So. 2d 20
  • 1999 WL 162971

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Act is not unconstitutionally vague and does not violate the equal protection clause or the separation of powers doctrine
  • agreeing tacitly with McKnight, expressly disagreeing with Cotton, and certifying conflict
  • agreeing tacitly with McKnight, expressly disagreeing with Cotton, and certifying conflict
  • noting apparent conflict with Cotton 's interpretation of the Act
  • rejecting vagueness challenge to the Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

143 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.