Skip to main content

State v. Wakefield

Citations

  • 324 Ga. App. 587
  • 751 S.E.2d 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial judge's failure to sua sponte recuse himself and disclose his sexual relationship with public defender was a violation of Judicial Code of Conduct
  • holding that trial judge’s failure to sua sponte recuse himself and disclose his sexual relationship with public defender was a violation of Judicial Code of Conduct
  • explaining that defendants were entitled to new trial, where the presiding judge should have sua sponte recused from each trial as a result of his sexual relationship with the public defender representing either the defendants or their co-defendants
  • affirming the reversal of convictions based on structural error when the “undisputed evidence supported the trial court’s factual finding” that the judge presiding over the trials and an attorney for some of the defendants had an “ongoing and intimate relationship” during the trials

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Branch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.