Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/15/1997
Banks v. Thomas
Citations
- 241 Conn. 569
- 698 A.2d 268
- 1997 Conn. LEXIS 201
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- because court rejected claim that statute had limited court's jurisdiction over writs of error, court was not required to \determine whether such a bar would be a constitutionally impermissible encroachment upon this court's authority to entertain a writ of error\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon, Dupont, Palmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-05-26· cited 170×
- State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-08-10· cited 115×
- Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-04-21· cited 114×
- Kim v. MagnottaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-06-01· cited 108×
- Williams v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-08-07· cited 91×
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-04-18· cited 77×
- Iovieno v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-26· cited 71×
- James L. v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-06-23· cited 63×
- State v. McCahillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-08-20· cited 61×
- Rowe v. Superior Court, Judicial District of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-12-09· cited 32×
- Burton v. BrowdSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-11-20· cited 19×
- B & B Bail Bonds Agency of Connecticut, Inc. v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-05-15· cited 18×
- Alliance Partners, Inc. v. Voltarc Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-04-22· cited 17×
- Kindl v. Department of Social ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-05-07· cited 13×
- Millward Brown, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-11-26· cited 10×
- State v. BanksConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-08-01· cited 9×
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-07-17· cited 8×
- Morrison v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-08-27· cited 8×
- Higgins v. ListonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-04-26· cited 6×
- Garcia v. FryD. Connecticut· 2016-05-12· cited 5×
Cites
55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court· 1985-03-18· cited 3,068×
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court· 1947-03-06· cited 2,872×
- In Re OliverSupreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 2,065×
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 1,344×
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 1,167×
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 815×
- Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1971-01-20· cited 732×
- Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 663×
- Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-09· cited 582×
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-18· cited 496×
- Sacher v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1952-04-21· cited 462×
- Codispoti v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 370×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1965-12-06· cited 344×
- United States v. Bobby G. SealeSeventh Circuit· 1972-07-06· cited 231×
- In Re MichaelSupreme Court· 1945-11-05· cited 230×
- Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-04-07· cited 204×
- Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-03· cited 190×
- In Re LittleSupreme Court· 1972-01-24· cited 176×
- Eaton v. City of TulsaSupreme Court· 1974-03-25· cited 161×
Other cases named Banks v. Thomas
6 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.