State v. Banks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering motion to correct claiming that General Statutes § 53a-37 did not authorize trial court to impose concurrent sentences for criminal contempt and criminal offense
• § 53a-37 inapplicable to criminal contempt, but court had inherent common-law power to impose concurrent or consecutive contempt terms
• no jurisdictional analysis when finding that trial court properly denied state's motion to correct that claimed General Statutes § 53a-37 did not authorize court to impose concurrent sentence
• no jurisdictional analysis when finding that trial court properly denied state’s motion to correct that claimed General Statutes § 53a-37 did not authorize court to impose concurrent sentence
• “The determination whether to impose concurrent or consecutive sentences is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rowe v. Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-12-09· cited 32×
• State v. Koslik
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-09-01· cited 28×
• State v. Leak
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-07-27· cited 12×
• State v. Hurdle
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2023-01-31· cited 7×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. King
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-07-27· cited 69×
• Banks v. Thomas
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-15· cited 47×
• State v. Jackson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1960-02-02· cited 43×
• Wilson v. Cohen
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-09· cited 42×
• Copeland v. Warden, State Prison
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-03-16· cited 40×
• Copeland v. Warden
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1991-09-24· cited 23×
• Leydon v. Town of Greenwich
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-05-16· cited 7×