Eleventh Circuit· 4/18/1991
Bank v. Pitt
Citations
- 928 F.2d 1108
- 19 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1165
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 6201
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a pro se plaintiff must generally be given “one chance to amend the complaint before the district court dismisses the action with prejudice”
- if a court determines dismissal is appropriate, a plaintiff must be given at 28 1 least one chance to amend a complaint when a more carefully drafted complaint might state 2 a claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Vibe Micro, Inc. v. Igor ShabanetsEleventh Circuit· 2018-01-03· cited 766×
- Wagner v. Daewoo Heavy Industries America Corp.Eleventh Circuit· 2002-12-10· cited 509×
- Caribbean Broadcasting System, Ltd. v. Cable & Wireless PLCD.C. Circuit· 1998-07-17· cited 401×
- Long v. SatzEleventh Circuit· 1999-07-22· cited 217×
- United States Ex Rel. Bledsoe v. Community Health Systems, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2003-09-10· cited 125×
- Allison v. McGhan Medical Corp.Eleventh Circuit· 1999-08-18· cited 90×
- Rolando Silva v. Edward W. BieluchEleventh Circuit· 2003-11-25· cited 83×
- Brandon, Jones, Sandall, Zeide, Kohn, Chalal & Musso, P.A. v. MedPartners, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2002-11-27· cited 49×
- O'Halloran v. First Union National Bank of FloridaEleventh Circuit· 2003-11-14· cited 31×
- Wendall Jermaine Hall v. Lieutenant Peter MerolaEleventh Circuit· 2023-05-17· cited 29×
- Druskin v. Answerthink, Inc.S.D. Florida· 2004-01-05· cited 27×
- Isbrandtsen Marine Services, Inc. v. M/V Inagua TaniaEleventh Circuit· 1996-08-20· cited 17×
- In Re SPORTSLINE.COM SECURITIES LITIGATIONS.D. Florida· 2004-07-19· cited 15×
- eCash Technologies, Inc. v. GuagliardoNinth Circuit· 2002-05-13· cited 11×
- Michael Horton v. Captain GilchristEleventh Circuit· 2025-02-13· cited 10×
- Alvi Armani Medical, Inc. v. HennesseyS.D. Florida· 2008-12-09· cited 9×
- Sturm v. Marriott Marquis Corp.N.D. Georgia· 2000-02-07· cited 8×
- Geter v. United States Government Publishing OfficeDistrict of Columbia· 2017-07-31· cited 6×
- Canty v. FRY'S ELECTRONICS, INC.N.D. Georgia· 2010-09-01· cited 5×
- Anderson v. United StatesM.D. Florida· 2002-06-03· cited 5×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaEleventh Circuit· 1981-11-03· cited 11,375×
- Murray Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1982-06-28· cited 1,401×
- Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court· 1978-05-15· cited 904×
- John W. Dussouy, Jr. v. Gulf Coast Investment CorporationFifth Circuit· 1981-11-05· cited 748×
- Bank v. PittEleventh Circuit· 1991-04-18· cited 285×
- Everett Earl Thomas v. Town of DavieEleventh Circuit· 1988-06-21· cited 138×
- Herman Friedlander, Etc., Cross-Appellees v. Jerry C. Nims, Timex Corporation, Cross-AppellantEleventh Circuit· 1985-03-19· cited 136×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,535 David A. Lipton and Sylvia S. Lipton v. Documation, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1984-06-18· cited 86×
- Christine Franklin v. The Gwinnett County Public Schools, a Local Education Agency (Lea), Dr. William Prescott, an IndividualEleventh Circuit· 1990-09-10· cited 67×
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. LiptonSupreme Court· 1985-01-07· cited 45×
- Tallahassee Branch of Naacp v. Leon County, FloridaEleventh Circuit· 1987-09-21· cited 31×
- Bienvenido Diaz v. Schwerman Trucking CompanyEleventh Circuit· 1983-06-30· cited 24×
- Johnny Sarter v. Lucille MaysFifth Circuit· 1974-03-25· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.