· 3/19/1985
Herman Friedlander, Etc., Cross-Appellees v. Jerry C. Nims, Timex Corporation, Cross-Appellant
Citations
- 755 F.2d 810
- 1 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 946
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28398
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a “district court should give a plaintiff an opportunity to amend his complaint rather than dismiss it when it appears that a more carefully drafted complaint might state a claim”
- “[A] court considering a motion to dismiss for failure to plead fraud with particularity should always be careful to harmonize . . . [R]ule 9(b) with the broader policy of notice pleading.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vance, Anderson, Pittman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.