Long v. Satz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff’s failure to properly request leave to amend “preclude[d] the plaintiff’s argument on appeal that the district court abused its discretion by denying her leave to amend her complaint”
• holding that a plaintiffs failure to properly request leave to amend “preclude[d] the plaintiffs argument on appeal that the district court abused its discretion by denying her leave to amend her complaint”
• holding that a plaintiff’s failure to properly request leave to amend “preclude[d] the plaintiff’s argument on appeal that the district court abused its discretion by denying her leave to amend her complaint”
• holding that a plaintiff’s failure to properly request leave to amend “preclude[d] the plaintiff’s argument on appeal that the district court abused its discretion by denying her leave to amend her complaint”
• holding that a plaintiffs failure to request leave to amend anywhere outside of her opposition to the motion to dismiss “preclude[d] the plaintiffs argument on appeal that the district court abused its discretion by denying her leave to amend her complaint”
• holding that plaintiff’s failure to properly request leave to amend her complaint, when she had adequate time and opportunity to do so, precluded her argument on appeal that the district court abused its discretion by denying leave

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).