Skip to main content
Federal Claims· 3/29/2002

Baldi Bros. Constructors v. United States

Citations

  • 52 Fed. Cl. 78
  • 32 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20638
  • 2002 U.S. Claims LEXIS 75
  • 2002 WL 500248

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the government cannot demonstrate that its position was substantially justified when it refused to address its conduct at all
  • concluding that Hensley requires that attorneys’ and experts’ fees be awarded with reference to plaintiffs actual success
  • explaining that hotel expenses would have been recoverable if they were properly substantiated
  • permitting travel expenses for plaintiffs attorney and expert witness but excluding travel expenses for other individuals
  • reducing plaintiff’s total fee request including fees attributable to the EAJA application by 33.3%
  • “Defendant cannot prove that the Government’s conduct was substantially justified when it does not address its conduct at all.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Baldi Bros. Constructors v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.