Skip to main content
· 10/22/1991

Levernier Construction, Inc. v. The United States

Citations

  • 947 F.2d 497
  • 24 Cl. Ct. 497
  • 37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,202
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 24849
  • 1991 WL 211225

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that hourly rate for attorneys and paralegals is prevailing market rate or statutory rate of $75 (now $125) per hour plus cost of living or special factor increase, whichever is lower
  • holding that a COLA is not available for paralegal awards
  • stating that this court is “not free to interpret the EAJA in any manner which is not based on the explicit congressional mandate”
  • reviewing EAJA award filed after the parties implemented a settlement agreement and the court entered judgment for the agreed amount
  • examining EAJA statute and precedent to conclude that fees incurred for challenging any agencies actions before a contracting officer were not recoverable, because they were not incurred during an adversary adjudication
  • preventing upward adjustments when attorneys’ billable rates were below the statutory cap

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michel, Plager, Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.