Baldi Bros. Constructors v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The general rule is that the risk of severe weather in a particular region is not shifted to the Government via the Differing Site Conditions clause.”
• awarding delay damages under the Differing Site Conditions clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• George Sollitt Construction Co. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2005-02-23· cited 47×
• Baldi Bros. Constructors v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2002-03-29· cited 19×
• Manuel Bros. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2002-12-23· cited 8×
• Orlosky Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2005-02-02· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hollerbach v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1914-04-06· cited 260×
• Dawco Construction, Inc. v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1991-04-03· cited 149×
• United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.
  Supreme Court· 1920-04-26· cited 140×
• Servidone Construction Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1991-04-24· cited 123×
• WRB Corp. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1968-04-19· cited 123×
• Flippin Materials Co. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1963-01-11· cited 102×
• Randa/madison Joint Venture III v. Gregory Robert Dahlberg, Acting Secretary of the Army
  Federal Circuit· 2001-02-07· cited 37×
• Servidone Construction Corp. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1990-02-02· cited 28×
• Railroad Waterproofing Corp. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1956-01-31· cited 21×
• Louis Caldera, Secretary of the Army v. J.S. Alberici Construction Co., Inc., and Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc. (Joint Venture)
  Federal Circuit· 1998-12-01· cited 18×