Baker v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• arbitration decisions relevant and admissible because it spoke to the “validity of Defendant's articulated non-discriminatory reason for its decision to terminate Plaintiff's employment”
• the district court found the arbitral decision was “plainly relevant” to the issue of pretext “because it supports the validity of Defendant’s articulated nondiscriminatory reason for its employment decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).