McCallum Highlands, Ltd. v. Washington Capital Dus, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that consideration from an original contract cannot constitute consideration for a subsequent modification
• “[Courts] do not, in the absence of any proof, assume that the nonmoving party could or would prove the necessary facts.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).