Court of Appeals of Maryland· 10/17/2003
Baker v. State
Citations
- 833 A.2d 1070
- 377 Md. 567
- 2003 Md. LEXIS 706
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a quo warranto action is the only available proceeding to chai- lenge a judge's legal authority to act in a particular case
- defining the bounds of the de facto judge doctrine by comparing United States Supreme Court decisions and collecting cases from other jurisdictions
- defining the bounds of the de facto judge doctrine by comparing United States Supreme Court decisions and collecting cases from other jurisdictions
- “[E]ven if, by virtue of a change of residence, [the judge] ceased to be a de jure judge [under the Maryland Constitution], he was, until his retirement, at the very least a de facto judge for the period relevant to this case.” (footnote omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-10-03· cited 23×
- Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, Iowa Renewable Fuels Association, and Iowa Water Environment AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa· 2014-07-11· cited 21×
- Estate of Garner v. SchindlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-06-07· cited 10×
- State v. IrbyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-09-04· cited 10×
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-11-10· cited 4×
- Baker v. MarylandSupreme Court· 2004-03-22
- Pett v. BRIGHAM CITY CORP.Court of Appeals of Utah· 2010-12-30
- Barber v. D.C. Commission on Selection and Tenure of Administrative Law JudgesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-09-23
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 712×
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 689×
- Ryder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-06-12· cited 381×
- Baker v. CorcoranFourth Circuit· 2000-07-19· cited 247×
- Schowgurow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-10-11· cited 239×
- Nguyen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2003-06-09· cited 140×
- Parker v. State ex rel. PowellIndiana Supreme Court· 1892-12-17· cited 113×
- Sheehan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1877-04-10· cited 54×
- Ex Parte Henry WardSupreme Court· 1899-03-20· cited 49×
- Carleton v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court· 1862-05-30· cited 46×
- Jennings-Jones v. Children's Harbor, Inc.Supreme Court· 2001-02-26· cited 45×
- Ridout v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 1930-07-14· cited 43×
- Clark v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1858-07-01· cited 36×
- Blount v. BostonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-10-06· cited 33×
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-11-12· cited 33×
- William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. v. International Curtiss Marine Turbine Co.Supreme Court· 1913-05-26· cited 32×
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-02-07· cited 32×
- Harwood v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1856-06-15· cited 26×
- Turner v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-01-18· cited 24×
- Crocker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1977-06-01· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.