Crocker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the evidence reveals several possible causes of an accident, it is improper to allow the jury to guess which cause might have been the proximate cause
• “[T]his Court has not hesitated to reverse awards in favor of buyers in warranty cases where there was no evidence connecting the damage to the defect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).