Blount v. Boston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• once a person’s place of domicile is determined, there is a presumption that it continues until superseded by new domicile
• Intent may be more satisfactorily shown by the acts of the individual, rather than by his words and is best shown by objective factors.
• “Orn-eases have characterized the place of voting as ‘the highest evidence of domicile.’ ”
• “This Court has held on numerous occasions that the ‘controlling factor in determining a person’s domicile is his intent. One’s domicile, generally, is that place where he intends it to be.’ ”
• qualification while serving as a member of General Assembly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).