Fourth Circuit· 6/1/1983
B. Frank Thomas v. J.D. Cox, Warden
Citations
- 708 F.2d 132
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 27164
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that there was no agency relationship where the fellow inmate initiated the contact with the authorities and was advised “to listen for but not elicit information”
- stating that agency requires that the actions of an inmate informant be “fairly ‘attributable to the Government’”
- inmate told to let police investigator know if he heard anything else and \to be alert to anything” the inmate \might say”
- absence of reward supports conclusion there was no quid pro quo
- inmate instructed not to ask any questions
- inmate instructed not to ask any questions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Widener, Phillips, Butzner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anthony N. Matteo v. Superintendent, Sci Albion the District Attorney of the County of Chester the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaThird Circuit· 1999-03-24· cited 317×
- United States v. Rex Eugene Love, United States of America v. Jerry Wayne SheppardFourth Circuit· 1998-01-20· cited 240×
- Ian Lightbourne v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 1987-11-30· cited 175×
- United States v. LentzFourth Circuit· 2008-05-12· cited 129×
- Ayers v. HudsonSixth Circuit· 2010-10-05· cited 127×
- United States v. Pasquale Panza, Seymour Ringle, Charles Fruscione, Gregory Cappello, Gregory Boutelle, Christopher MerlinoSecond Circuit· 1984-12-18· cited 126×
- People v. WhittCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-08-27· cited 113×
- United States v. Anthony TaylorTenth Circuit· 1986-09-08· cited 104×
- United States v. JohnsonTenth Circuit· 1993-09-09· cited 92×
- Manns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-12-17· cited 91×
- State v. QuattlebaumSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-24· cited 90×
- United States v. PalaciosFourth Circuit· 2012-04-30· cited 82×
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-10· cited 71×
- Commonwealth v. HiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-03-09· cited 52×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1994-07-15· cited 50×
- People v. CatelliCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-02-26· cited 40×
- Commonwealth v. ReynoldsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-04-15· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. RancourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-02-18· cited 34×
- State v. HernandezTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1993-02-03· cited 34×
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-08-06· cited 28×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 3,189×
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 2,626×
- United States v. HenrySupreme Court· 1980-06-16· cited 1,013×
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court· 1982-03-22· cited 691×
- United States v. Guillermo Novo Sampol, United States of America v. Alvin Ross Diaz, United States of America v. Ignacio Novo SampolD.C. Circuit· 1980-12-09· cited 283×
- United States v. Arshad Ali Malik and Khalid Yousaf MalikSeventh Circuit· 1982-06-15· cited 56×
- United States v. James Louis SurridgeEighth Circuit· 1982-08-30· cited 54×
- United States v. Joseph Calder, Julius Calder, Thomas Didonato and George MongeSecond Circuit· 1981-04-20· cited 45×
- Thomas E. Taylor v. William LombardSecond Circuit· 1979-10-01· cited 41×
- United States v. Phillip Dale Van ScoyThird Circuit· 1981-06-22· cited 37×
- Billy Gale Henry v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1978-12-26· cited 24×
- Charley Spry v. Otto C. Boles, Warden, West Virginia State PenitentiaryFourth Circuit· 1962-02-13· cited 22×
- Surridge v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1982-11-29· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.