United States v. Anthony Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was harmless error to give an unsupported constructive-possession instruction along with an adequately supported actual-possession instruction
• holding that “any other objections as far as sentencing, or any other matters I failed to address on behalf of the defendant,” qualified as the Bostic question
• finding a “fleeting and inexplicit” comment did not “put the district court on notice of [a procedural objection]”
• endorsing, in dicta, Caruthers’s method of analysis of a pre-1989 Tennessee third degree burglary offense
• affirming ACCA sentence where prior convictions qualified under use-of-force and enumerated- offense clauses
• affirming ACCA sentence where prior convictions qualified under use-of-force and enumerated- offense clauses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).