Skip to main content
· 8/30/1982

United States v. James Louis Surridge

Citations

  • 687 F.2d 250
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 26055

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he key issue is the extent of government involvement. When the government pays an informant, it is evidence (although not conclusive) that a prior agreement between the government and the informant existed, whether that agreement was explicit or implicit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bright, Gibson, Arnold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.