Skip to main content

Aveta Inc. v. Cavallieri

Citations

  • 23 A.3d 157
  • 2010 WL 3681011
  • 2010 Del. Ch. LEXIS 197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that merger consideration can be made contingent on facts ascertainable outside the merger agreement, which can be a determination by a party on behalf of all stockholders
  • holding that principal stockholders who signed merger agreement were bound to its terms
  • stating that “[p]arties are in privity . . . when their interests are identical or closely aligned such that they were actively and adequately represented in the first suit”
  • interpreting Puerto Rico’s version of Section 251, which tracks Delaware's provision, and concluding that the post-closing price adjustment was permissible
  • dismissing complaint on stare decisis grounds upon concluding that the new complaint did not plead new facts “beyond what [was] previously considered.”
  • finding privity among shareholders when a Purchase Agreement designated a Shareholders’ Representative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Laster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.