Skip to main content
· 7/26/2000

Kohls v. Kenetech Corp.

Citations

  • 791 A.2d 763
  • 2000 Del. Ch. LEXIS 102
  • 2000 WL 33671762

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[P]reclusion can properly be imposed when the claimant’s conduct induces the opposing party reasonably to suppose that the litigation will firmly stabilize the latter’s legal obligations.”
  • “[B]ecause the Kohls fail to distinguish their claims, either factually or legally, from those [dismissed in a prior action . . . [n]ormal respect for the principle of stare decisis . . . require[s] that I dismiss this complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lamb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.