· 7/26/2000
Kohls v. Kenetech Corp.
Citations
- 791 A.2d 763
- 2000 Del. Ch. LEXIS 102
- 2000 WL 33671762
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[P]reclusion can properly be imposed when the claimant’s conduct induces the opposing party reasonably to suppose that the litigation will firmly stabilize the latter’s legal obligations.”
- “[B]ecause the Kohls fail to distinguish their claims, either factually or legally, from those [dismissed in a prior action . . . [n]ormal respect for the principle of stare decisis . . . require[s] that I dismiss this complaint.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lamb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.