Austin-Spearman v. AARP & AARP Services Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing breach of express contract claim because the promises plaintiff alleged appeared nowhere in the actual privacy policy provided by plaintiff
• “But conclusory statements regarding a plaintiff’s own beliefs and expectations are not sufficient to support an alleged ‘overpayment’ injury[.]”
• “But conclusory statements regarding a plaintiff’s own beliefs and expectations are not sufficient to support an alleged ‘overpayment’ injury[.]”
• the court “need not accept factual inferences drawn by plaintiffs if those inferences are not supported by facts alleged in the complaint, nor must the Court accept plaintiff’s legal conclusions.”
• plaintiff lacked standing where she “received the benefit of her bargain”
• “This Court finds that, having not established that she actually lost any of the value of her membership, [the plaintiff] has not plausibly claimed that she overpaid for the AARP membership agreement such that she was injured economically and now has standing to sue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).