General Motors Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a letter from an agency that \reflect[ed] neither a new interpretation nor a new policy\ did not \impose new obligations\
• holding that EPA letters were not reviewable final agency actions because the letters “reflect neither a new interpretation nor a new policy”
• holding that a letter from an agency that reflected \neither a new interpretation nor a new policy\ did not \impose new obligations\
• noting that “[a]s a court of limited jurisdiction, we begin, and end, with an examination of our jurisdiction”
• noting that “[a]s a court of limited jurisdiction, we begin, and end, with an examination of our jurisdiction”
• noting that “[a]s a court of limited jurisdiction, we begin, and end, with an examination of our jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).