Aurora Shipping Co. v. Boyce
Citations
- 191 F. 960
- 112 C.C.A. 372
- 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 5012
Syllabus
<p>1. Shipping (§§ 79, 87*) — Admiralty (§ 28*) — Jurisdiction—Suit in Rem for Maritime Tort — Oregon Statute.</p> <p>B. & C. Comp. Or. § 381, giving a right of action for wrongful death, together with section 5706, which provides that “every boat or vessel used in navigating the waters of this state * * * shall be liable and subject to a lien * * * tor damages or injuries done to persons or property by such boat or vessel,” and section 5708, which provides that “any person having a demand as aforesaid instead of proceeding against the master, owner, agent or consignee of the boat or vessel may at his option commence an action against such boat or vessel by name,” create a statutory right of action and a statutory lien on a vessel where the injury causing death happens on board such vessel within the state by reason of the fault or negligence of its officers, although the vessel was afloat on navigable waters and subject to the admiralty jurisdiction, and the injury constitutes a maritime tort, and such right of action and lien may be enforced by a suit in rem in a court of admiralty.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Shipping, Dec. Dig. §§ 79, 87 ;* Admiralty, Dec. Dig. § 28.*]</p> <p>2. Admiralty (§ 18*) — Jurisdiction—Attempted Limitation by State Statute.</p> <p>A state Legislature, while it may create a right of action for a maritime tort and a lien therefor, has no power to invest a court of the state with exclusive jurisdiction of suits in rem against vessels to enforce sucli right and lien.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Admiralty, Dec. Dig. § 18.*</p> <p>Admiralty jurisdiction of torts, see note to Campbell v. H. Hackfeld & Co., 62 C. C. A. 279.]</p> <p>8. Shipping (§ 87*) — Oregon Statute Giving Liens for Torts — Construction.</p> <p>B. & C. Comp. Or. § 5706, providing that boats and vessels shall be subject to a lien for damages or injuries done to persons or property, is not limited in its scope to such personal injuries only as do not r
Judges: Gilbert, Hanford, Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- The Admiral PeoplesSupreme Court· 1935-06-03· cited 111×
- Moore v. Purse Seine NetCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-10-20· cited 24×
- Port of New York Authority v. Red Star Towing & Transportation Co.S.D. New York· 1959-04-14· cited 10×
- The HorsaE.D. South Carolina· 1915-10-01· cited 9×
- The BrandD. Oregon· 1928-10-08· cited 7×
- The BeeD. Oregon· 1914-08-31· cited 7×
- The Shang HoW.D. Washington· 1936-02-19· cited 3×
- The GwyneddThird Circuit· 1915-12-08· cited 2×
- Piper v. KnudsenD. Oregon· 1928-10-08· cited 1×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- The OregonSupreme Court· 1895-05-06· cited 395×
- SHERLOCK v. Alling, AdmInistratorSupreme Court· 1876-11-18· cited 306×
- The HamiltonSupreme Court· 1907-12-23· cited 264×
- The IroquoisSupreme Court· 1904-05-02· cited 130×
- Insurance Co. v. BrameSupreme Court· 1878-01-21· cited 118×
- The Steamboat New World v. KingSupreme Court· 1854-05-16· cited 117×
- Homer Ramsdell Transportation Co. v. La Compagnie Générale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court· 1901-05-27· cited 116×
- The Albert DumoisSupreme Court· 1900-04-09· cited 107×
- The GlideSupreme Court· 1897-05-24· cited 92×
- The\ City of Panama\Supreme Court· 1880-05-10· cited 91×
- The \Juniata.\Supreme Court· 1876-12-18· cited 39×
- The A. HeatonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts· 1890-09-09· cited 29×
- Oregon Imp. Co. v. NelsonNinth Circuit· 1895-09-18· cited 29×
- McCullough v. New York, N. H. & H. R.Second Circuit· 1894-04-19· cited 28×
- North Pac. Coast R. Co. v. HallNinth Circuit· 1905-10-16· cited 27×
- The LottaD. South Carolina· 1907-01-31· cited 20×
- Kenney v. LouieNinth Circuit· 1904-03-07· cited 18×
- Humboldt Lumber Manufacturers' Ass'n v. ChristophersonNinth Circuit· 1896-02-19· cited 17×
- Laidlaw v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.Ninth Circuit· 1897-06-28· cited 17×
- The Glendale v. EvichFourth Circuit· 1897-07-10· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.